<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1.6 Beta2 out, IRM2 work continues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yannramin.com/2007/08/15/16-beta2-out-irm2-work-continues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yannramin.com/2007/08/15/16-beta2-out-irm2-work-continues/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:05:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: atrus</title>
		<link>http://yannramin.com/2007/08/15/16-beta2-out-irm2-work-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>atrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yannramin.com/2007/08/15/16-beta2-out-irm2-work-continues/#comment-464</guid>
		<description>Bug reports can be left on Bugzilla:

http://www.svnhosting.com/bugs/irm/

IRM 2 is written within Tapestry 5, which is a framework in its own right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bug reports can be left on Bugzilla:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.svnhosting.com/bugs/irm/" rel="nofollow">http://www.svnhosting.com/bugs/irm/</a></p>
<p>IRM 2 is written within Tapestry 5, which is a framework in its own right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Stevenson</title>
		<link>http://yannramin.com/2007/08/15/16-beta2-out-irm2-work-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Stevenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yannramin.com/2007/08/15/16-beta2-out-irm2-work-continues/#comment-448</guid>
		<description>Have you thought about putting IRM2 in a MVC framework such as Zend Framework or cakePHP?  You can develop your code so much faster, and it would be clean and organized.  Then outside contributers can use the MVC framework to create add on modules, without trying to figure out what is going on in the current code implementation.  

Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you thought about putting IRM2 in a MVC framework such as Zend Framework or cakePHP?  You can develop your code so much faster, and it would be clean and organized.  Then outside contributers can use the MVC framework to create add on modules, without trying to figure out what is going on in the current code implementation.  </p>
<p>Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://yannramin.com/2007/08/15/16-beta2-out-irm2-work-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yannramin.com/2007/08/15/16-beta2-out-irm2-work-continues/#comment-434</guid>
		<description>Where can i report the bugs of irm 1.6 beta 2?

Thanks Christian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where can i report the bugs of irm 1.6 beta 2?</p>
<p>Thanks Christian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atrus</title>
		<link>http://yannramin.com/2007/08/15/16-beta2-out-irm2-work-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>atrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yannramin.com/2007/08/15/16-beta2-out-irm2-work-continues/#comment-431</guid>
		<description>IRM 1.6 does have the devices feature, which lets you create customizable tables beyond the &quot;Computers&quot; option. I&#039;d suggest downloading 1.6b2 and giving it a try - this functionality is disabled on the demo site as it requires admin privileges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IRM 1.6 does have the devices feature, which lets you create customizable tables beyond the &#8220;Computers&#8221; option. I&#8217;d suggest downloading 1.6b2 and giving it a try &#8211; this functionality is disabled on the demo site as it requires admin privileges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atul</title>
		<link>http://yannramin.com/2007/08/15/16-beta2-out-irm2-work-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>atul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yannramin.com/2007/08/15/16-beta2-out-irm2-work-continues/#comment-430</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just in the process of evaluating IRM, however, before I go ahead - I was wandering how long do you
expect before releasing IRM2? 

I was hoping to tailor IRM for our needs (the attributes of a computer is a little out-of-date), but I 
see IRM2 will be custimisable - so I&#039;d rather wait, but obviously not too long.

thanks
atul.

P.S. IRM looks good so far, I wanted to feedback some experience in setting it up - should i do that on the forum?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just in the process of evaluating IRM, however, before I go ahead &#8211; I was wandering how long do you<br />
expect before releasing IRM2? </p>
<p>I was hoping to tailor IRM for our needs (the attributes of a computer is a little out-of-date), but I<br />
see IRM2 will be custimisable &#8211; so I&#8217;d rather wait, but obviously not too long.</p>
<p>thanks<br />
atul.</p>
<p>P.S. IRM looks good so far, I wanted to feedback some experience in setting it up &#8211; should i do that on the forum?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.178 seconds -->

