<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IRM 1.6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yannramin.com/2007/05/30/irm-16/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yannramin.com/2007/05/30/irm-16/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 01:31:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://yannramin.com/2007/05/30/irm-16/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yannramin.com/2007/05/30/irm-16/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Hello,

I woud strongly suggest a serious erritant problem in IRM. 

First i will explain something, by my compagny i have allmost all devices (switches printers and computers) stickerd with the IRM number. 

Example: I connect my switch with irm nr. 62 port 8 to switch irm nr 23 port 2. So in IRM i go to devices and then to networking. I select the first switch and i click the port i want to connect. And then i would like to select the second switch, but i only can see the name of the switch, i can not find the switch bij IRM number. But we have a lot of the same switches so i really don&#039;t know wich switch i have to choose. 

For me i fixed the problem so to set the nae als follow: (23) 3COM[type number] but i really suggest that i can find my switch by IRM number. 

Am i the only one with this problem? 

We used IRM like a year very intensive and i really like this system. But i think that I my suggestions here often down will set, for a positive development of IRM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I woud strongly suggest a serious erritant problem in IRM. </p>
<p>First i will explain something, by my compagny i have allmost all devices (switches printers and computers) stickerd with the IRM number. </p>
<p>Example: I connect my switch with irm nr. 62 port 8 to switch irm nr 23 port 2. So in IRM i go to devices and then to networking. I select the first switch and i click the port i want to connect. And then i would like to select the second switch, but i only can see the name of the switch, i can not find the switch bij IRM number. But we have a lot of the same switches so i really don&#8217;t know wich switch i have to choose. </p>
<p>For me i fixed the problem so to set the nae als follow: (23) 3COM[type number] but i really suggest that i can find my switch by IRM number. </p>
<p>Am i the only one with this problem? </p>
<p>We used IRM like a year very intensive and i really like this system. But i think that I my suggestions here often down will set, for a positive development of IRM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atrus</title>
		<link>http://yannramin.com/2007/05/30/irm-16/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>atrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yannramin.com/2007/05/30/irm-16/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Yes, the current code repository is at:
http://www.svnhosting.com/svn/irm/oldirm/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the current code repository is at:<br />
<a href="http://www.svnhosting.com/svn/irm/oldirm/" rel="nofollow">http://www.svnhosting.com/svn/irm/oldirm/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://yannramin.com/2007/05/30/irm-16/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yannramin.com/2007/05/30/irm-16/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Hi,

you may remember I posted a bug from irm 1.5.8.

It looks like 1.60 has that bugged ironed out.

I checked the file mod dates on the 1.5.8-dev download and unless the file mod dates are static, no mods are ocurring to this code which means that if its been fixed, the fix is not in this release. The question is: is the development code available?

I don&#039;t have time to contribute code but I can test it.

Craig</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>you may remember I posted a bug from irm 1.5.8.</p>
<p>It looks like 1.60 has that bugged ironed out.</p>
<p>I checked the file mod dates on the 1.5.8-dev download and unless the file mod dates are static, no mods are ocurring to this code which means that if its been fixed, the fix is not in this release. The question is: is the development code available?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have time to contribute code but I can test it.</p>
<p>Craig</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

